#8 of 8
Amazon 1–2 star share
not available
not available
A beautifully smooth, pleasant-sounding bladeless tower, but in CNET's test it tied for the weakest airflow, drew 50 W on high, and costs about twice as much as Shark's bladeless fan.
Top complaints
- Weakest airflow
CNET measured a 197 FPM median (tied for lowest) and 315 FPM max.
Source: CNET - Expensive for simple features
CNET says its simple features and $400 price, about twice the Shark and Dreame bladeless fans, kept it from being the bladeless pick. Oscillation is only 70 degrees.
Source: CNET - Power-hungry on high
CNET measured 50 W on high, among the least efficient fans it tested.
Source: CNET
Skip it if…
- You want strong cooling
- You care about value
- You want app control or wide oscillation
Good for
- Gentle, smooth airflow
- Pleasant white noise
- Design-focused rooms
Scores (tap for why)
What experts say
- CNET: 8/10 (July 2026), not a pick: exceptional air texture and white noise, but simple features and a $400 price hold it back.
Check price on AmazonWe don't list prices — they change daily. Paid link.