ConsFirst / Fitness trackers

Samsung

Samsung Galaxy Fit3: the downsides first

We may earn a commission when you buy through our links. It never changes what we report. Learn more

#7 of 8
$$Screen bandAndroid onlyScore 3.5/5
10%
of Amazon ratings are 1–2 stars
(checked 2026-10-10)Measured on a listing labeled 'International Model (Fast Charger Bundle)' (2,971 ratings).

PCMag's best affordable Android tracker: a bigger 1.6-inch AMOLED screen than the Inspire 3 and heart-rate tracking that stayed within a few beats of an Apple Watch Ultra 2. It doesn't work with iPhones, it left gaps in PCMag's sleep data, and battery fell short of Samsung's 13-day claim.

Top complaints

  • Android only, with Samsung-only extras

    PCMag lists no iOS support and some features exclusive to Samsung phones as cons. It also lacks GPS, tap-to-pay, apps and an energy score.

    Source: PCMag (Galaxy Fit3 review), PCMag (best fitness trackers)
  • Gaps in sleep data

    PCMag saw roughly 30-minute gaps in its sleep-stage charts on several nights, which made it underestimate sleep. It says the Inspire 3 is better for sleep.

    Source: PCMag (Galaxy Fit3 review)
  • Battery below the claim; mixed size opinions

    PCMag got 7.5 days (4.5 with the always-on display) against Samsung's 13-day estimate. Amazon owners report anything from 4 days to 2 weeks, and some find it too small.

    Source: PCMag (Galaxy Fit3 review), Amazon.com product page (Customers say)

What owners love

Good for
  • Android (especially Samsung) phone owners
  • Accurate workout heart rate on a budget
  • A large, readable screen

Scores (tap for why)

What experts say

  • PCMag: Best affordable Android tracker, 4.0/5 Editors' Choice (updated 2026-09-24). The cons are gaps in sleep data, Samsung-only features, and no iOS support.
  • PCMag (Galaxy Fit3 review): Full review: 'small, simple, and capable', with accurate exercise heart rate at a $69.99 MSRP, but it failed to auto-record walks during testing.
Check price on AmazonWe don't list prices — they change daily. Paid link.

If that catch is a deal-breaker

Highly ranked fitness trackers whose biggest complaint is something else.

#1 in fitness trackersXiaomi Smart Band 10

Tom's Guide's best budget tracker: about half the price of a Fitbit, with a bright 1.72-inch AMOLED screen, 159 activity modes and step counts that matched an Oura Ring. Battery fell well short of the 21-day claim in its test, and the app's insights feel less actionable than pricier rivals'.

Its catch: battery well short of 21 days#2 in fitness trackersAmazfit Helio Strap

A $99, subscription-free Whoop alternative with detailed sleep and recovery data in the Zepp app and 8 to 12 days per charge. Its automatic workout detection was unreliable in Tom's Guide's testing (it once logged a car drive as part of a hike), and Wirecutter finds its app less detailed than Whoop's.

Its catch: unreliable automatic workout detection#3 in fitness trackersFitbit (Google) Google Fitbit Air

The top screenless pick at Wirecutter, Tom's Guide and PCMag: a $99 pebble-sized band that was the most accurate step counter in Wirecutter's tests and the most comfortable band it has tried. You only see data in the app, automatic workout detection is unreliable, and some of the best features sit behind Google's optional subscription.

Its catch: automatic workout tracking is hit or miss

See all 8 fitness trackers ranked →