ConsFirst / Instant cameras

Polaroid

Polaroid I-2: the downsides first

We may earn a commission when you buy through our links. It never changes what we report. Learn more

#8 of 8
$$$PolaroidScore 3.2/5
24%
of Amazon ratings are 1–2 stars
(checked 2026-10-10)
Very small sample (22 ratings) on a camera-plus-film bundle listing; treat as indicative only.

TechRadar's best premium instant camera: the first with full manual exposure, plus LiDAR autofocus and a sharp lens on big Polaroid prints. It's expensive to buy and to feed (about $2 a shot), bulky, and Wirecutter and TechRadar both got inconsistent, often overexposed results.

Film cost: Polaroid I-Type film: about $19 per 8-shot pack (PCMag), around $2 per exposure (PCMag); from $2.12 a print (TechRadar). The most expensive film here.

Top complaints

  • Very expensive camera and film

    TechRadar says it costs more than rivals, with film costs to match (I-Type from $2.12 a print). PCMag calls Polaroid film expensive and tricky to use, at about $19 per 8-shot pack. Amazon's summary says several owners feel it doesn't justify its price.

  • Inconsistent, often overexposed results

    Wirecutter got some shots overexposed even when the meter said they were fine, plus oddly cropped or out-of-focus shots. TechRadar found results less consistent than Instax, with many auto shots overexposed.

  • Bulky, with some handling limits

    TechRadar calls it the biggest instant camera around and too cumbersome to use one-handed. PCMag says the 1/250-second top shutter speed limits it in bright light, there's no manual focus, and tripod plates may block the film door.

    Source: TechRadar, PCMag

What owners love

  • Full manual control

    TechRadar says it's the first instant camera with full manual exposure. Wirecutter found it easy to switch from auto to manual. PCMag adds Bluetooth app remote control and external-flash support.

  • Sharp lens and accurate autofocus

    PCMag praises the crisp lens with close focus, precise LiDAR autofocus and a large, bright viewfinder. TechRadar found the AF surprisingly effective for centered subjects.

    Source: PCMag, TechRadar
  • Premium, durable build

    Wirecutter notes the premium build. PCMag says it feels sturdier than old Polaroid bodies and the USB-C battery lasts up to 15 film packs. TechRadar says it felt durable.

Good for
  • Experienced photographers who want manual control on instant film
  • Large classic Polaroid prints
  • Using vintage 600 and SX-70 film too

Scores (tap for why)

  • Photo quality3.0
    Why 3.0?Crisp lens and subtle vintage-style prints (PCMag, TechRadar), but inconsistent, often overexposed results (Wirecutter, TechRadar).
  • Ease of use2.5
    Why 2.5?Easy to switch modes (Wirecutter), but bulky and cumbersome one-handed (TechRadar), and the film is tricky to use (PCMag).
  • Film cost1.5
    Why 1.5?I-Type is about $2 or more per shot (PCMag, TechRadar), and TechRadar says learning manual exposure takes a lot of film.
  • Features & control5.0
    Why 5.0?Full manual exposure, LiDAR AF, app remote, external flash support and multi-exposure (PCMag, TechRadar).
    Source: PCMag, TechRadar
  • Build & battery4.0
    Why 4.0?Sturdy, premium build and a USB-C battery rated for up to 15 packs, which held up in PCMag's test; heavy at about 1.2 pounds (PCMag).

What experts say

  • TechRadar: Best premium instant camera (updated 2026-07-17). The cons are that it's more expensive than rivals and less consistent than Instax.
  • PCMag: Best Polaroid for shutterbugs, rated 3.5 (Good). The cons are expensive, tricky film, a limiting 1/250-second shutter and no manual focus.
  • Wirecutter (NYT): Not a pick: premium build and fun to use, but 'our results were mixed', with overexposed, oddly cropped or out-of-focus shots.
Check price on AmazonWe don't list prices — they change daily. Paid link.

If that catch is a deal-breaker

Highly ranked instant cameras whose biggest complaint is something else.

See all 8 instant cameras ranked →