ConsFirst / Nonstick pans

Caraway

Caraway 10.5" Non-Stick Ceramic Fry Pan: the downsides first

We may earn a commission when you buy through our links. It never changes what we report. Learn more

#8 of 8
$$$Ceramic nonstickScore 2.2/5
Amazon 1–2 star share
not available

A stylish, PTFE-free ceramic pan that releases food well at first, but three test labs were unimpressed: Wirecutter saw it lose its slickness within months, CNET found it slow to heat, and Good Housekeeping couldn't get an even sear. It costs $125.

Top complaints

  • Loses slickness fast

    Wirecutter says the Caraway pan it tested lost its slickness within a few months, and it explains that ceramic coatings deplete with use.

    Source: Wirecutter
  • Heavy, unbalanced, high straight sides

    Wirecutter calls it one of the heaviest pans tested (almost 3 lb), unbalanced and hard to maneuver, with very straight, high sides. Caraway lists it at 2.7 lb.

  • Slow, uneven heating; exterior stains

    CNET found slow conductivity in its ice test. Good Housekeeping says it didn't sear steak evenly and the exterior stained.

What owners love

  • Releases food well when new

    CNET says it released food well.

    Source: CNET
  • Easy to clean

    A Good Housekeeping analyst who has used one for years loves that it is easy to clean.

  • PTFE-free, stylish

    Caraway says the pan is made without PTFE, PFOA and PFAS. Good Housekeeping agrees its cookware is stylish.

Good for
  • Looks and color choice
  • Avoiding PTFE (Caraway says it is made without PTFE, PFOA and PFAS)
  • Gentle, low-heat cooking

Scores (tap for why)

  • Nonstick release3.0
    Why 3.0?Releases food well when new (CNET), but Wirecutter's tested pan lost its slickness in a few months.
    Source: CNET, Wirecutter
  • Even heating2.5
    Why 2.5?Slow conductivity (CNET); no good, even sear (Good Housekeeping).
  • Handle & weight2.0
    Why 2.0?Among the heaviest tested and unbalanced, with high straight sides (Wirecutter).
    Source: Wirecutter
  • Coating durability2.0
    Why 2.0?Lost its slickness within months in Wirecutter's use; the exterior stained in Good Housekeeping's tests.
  • Value1.5
    Why 1.5?$125 from Caraway; Wirecutter and CNET both call it expensive for its performance.

What experts say

  • Wirecutter (NYT): Dismissed: almost 3 lb, unbalanced, straight high sides, over $100, and it lost its slickness in a few months.
  • CNET: Also tested: released food well, but slow conductivity in the ice test, and expensive.
  • Good Housekeeping: Also tested: stylish and easy to clean, but no good, even sear on steak, and the exterior stained.
Check price on AmazonMaker's pageWe don't list prices — they change daily. Paid link.

If that catch is a deal-breaker

Highly ranked nonstick pans whose biggest complaint is something else.

See all 8 nonstick pans ranked →