ConsFirst / Robot vacuums

Shark

Shark AI Ultra Robot Vacuum with Self-Empty Base: the downsides first

We may earn a commission when you buy through our links. It never changes what we report. Learn more

#6 of 8
$$Self-emptyingScore 2.8/5
18%
of Amazon ratings are 1–2 stars
(checked 2026-10-10)

Amazon's best-selling robot vacuum, with a bagless self-empty base, but RTINGS found it bad at pet hair on carpet, demanding to maintain and paired with a slow, buggy app. Owners report it getting stuck and dropping Wi-Fi.

Top complaints

  • Weak on pet hair, edges and fine debris

    RTINGS found it bad at pet hair: the brush presses hair into low-pile carpet instead of lifting it. It also does a poor job in corners and along walls, and its side brushes scatter debris. Amazon's review summary says some owners find it doesn't clean the entire floor.

  • Gets stuck, ignores no-go zones, drops Wi-Fi

    Amazon's summary says owners report it getting stuck on rugs, needing frequent Wi-Fi reconnection, and in some cases stopping working after two weeks. A 2-star Walmart review says it ignores no-go zones and sucks up cords. RTINGS calls the SharkClean app slow and buggy, and it needs a constant 2.4 GHz network.

  • Messy, frequent upkeep

    RTINGS says the robot's dustbin is incredibly small, so it empties after almost every job. The bagless dock is messier and less hygienic than bag docks, and the AV2501S base is rated for only 30 days. Many parts need regular cleaning, the pre-motor filter shouldn't be washed, and recurring costs are high.

What owners love

  • Quiet robot

    RTINGS calls it remarkably quiet, peaking at 63.7 dBA in Max mode, though the dock reaches 69.2 dBA.

  • Self-empties, no bags to buy

    RTINGS lists self-emptying and decent bare-floor performance as pros, and notes the bagless base cuts ownership costs.

  • Handles rug tassels; owners like it for pet hair

    RTINGS says it climbs over tasseled rugs without often getting stuck, which is rare. Amazon shoppers say it picks up pet hair and debris well, which conflicts with RTINGS' carpet test.

Good for
  • Mostly bare floors
  • Rugs with tassels (it climbs over them)
  • Skipping disposable dock bags

Scores (tap for why)

  • Cleaning power2.5
    Why 2.5?RTINGS: decent on bare floors, bad on pet hair, poor at edges and with fine debris. Amazon cleaning feedback is mixed.
  • Navigation3.0
    Why 3.0?Organized LiDAR pattern, but no camera; it may treat cords as obstacles and can't fit under low furniture (10.5 cm). Owners report it getting stuck on rugs.
  • Low maintenance2.5
    Why 2.5?Self-empties, but the tiny robot bin, small bagless base and many parts to clean make upkeep demanding (RTINGS).
  • App & reliability2.0
    Why 2.0?RTINGS: the app is slow and buggy and sometimes reports the wrong status. Amazon owners report Wi-Fi reconnection problems and some early failures.
  • Quietness4.0
    Why 4.0?63.7 dBA peak per RTINGS. Amazon noise feedback is mixed, and the dock is louder.

What experts say

  • RTINGS: A decent feature set, but cheaper models perform similarly. Cons: demanding maintenance, high recurring costs, trouble with solid debris and pet hair on low-pile carpet, and an unremarkable, buggy app (test bench updated 2025-07-02).
Check price on AmazonMaker's pageWe don't list prices — they change daily. Paid link.

If that catch is a deal-breaker

Highly ranked robot vacuums whose biggest complaint is something else.

See all 8 robot vacuums ranked →