ConsFirst / Water filter pitchers

LARQ

LARQ Pitcher PureVis with Advanced Filter: the downsides first

We may earn a commission when you buy through our links. It never changes what we report. Learn more

#3 of 8
$$$PitcherScore 3.5/5
17%
of Amazon ratings are 1–2 stars
(checked 2026-10-10)
Small sample: 547 ratings.

A premium, dishwasher-safe pitcher with an app, a UV-C light and an Advanced filter that covers PFOA/PFOS. It costs several times more than a Brita, its filters cost about $120 a year, and the app and charger can be finicky.

Subscription: Optional: filter subscription; Serious Eats lists $26 per filter with subscription vs $33 standard

Top complaints

  • Expensive pitcher and filters

    CNN calls it the priciest in its pool, with Advanced filters lasting 60 gallons at about 42 cents per gallon. Good Housekeeping says yearly filter cost is higher than others, and Serious Eats lists it among the most expensive.

  • App and charger quirks

    Good Housekeeping found the app occasionally disconnected after a year, making tracking less accurate. Serious Eats says the magnetic charger falls off easily if bumped.

  • Battery or unit failures

    Amazon's review summary says some owners report it stopped charging after 1.5 months or broke within two months.

What owners love

  • Broad certified filter

    The Advanced filter is NSF/ANSI 42, 53 and 401 per Serious Eats, Good Housekeeping and CNN, covering lead and PFOA/PFOS. Good Housekeeping counts over 45 contaminants from third-party data.

  • Comfortable, easy to fill, dishwasher-safe

    Thick, comfortable handle and large trapdoor (Serious Eats); one of the few dishwasher-safe pitchers Good Housekeeping tested, with an easy-pour spout.

  • Great-tasting water, fast filtering

    Good Housekeeping says the water tastes amazing and the pitcher filters rapidly. Amazon owners say there's no chlorine taste.

Good for
  • A dishwasher-safe, design-forward pitcher
  • Tracking filter use in an app
  • Great-tasting water

Scores (tap for why)

  • Filtration (certified)4.5
    Why 4.5?Advanced filter: NSF/ANSI 42, 53 and 401, including lead and PFOA/PFOS (Serious Eats, CNN, Good Housekeeping). The Essential filter covers far less (CNN).
  • Filter speed4.0
    Why 4.0?Good Housekeeping says it filters water rapidly.
  • Filter cost & life2.0
    Why 2.0?60-gallon filter; about $120 a year (Good Housekeeping) or about 42 cents per gallon (CNN).
  • Easy to use & clean4.0
    Why 4.0?Dishwasher-safe, trapdoor fill, comfortable handle and app tracking (Good Housekeeping, Serious Eats); needs monthly charging and the charger falls off easily.
  • Leaks & durability3.0
    Why 3.0?Some Amazon owners report charging failures or breakage within two months (small sample); Good Housekeeping used one for over a year with only app disconnects noted.

What experts say

  • Serious Eats: Best splurge: comfortable, easy to fill, with app tracking and UV-C; expensive, and the charger falls off easily.
  • Good Housekeeping: Best with UV light: amazing-tasting water, rapid filtering, dishwasher-safe; pricey filters and an app that sometimes disconnects.
  • CNN Underscored: Not a pick: clean taste, but the highest price in its pool, and CNN saw no strong evidence that the UV-C feature matters in a well-kept pitcher.
Check price on AmazonWe don't list prices — they change daily. Paid link.

If that catch is a deal-breaker

Highly ranked water filter pitchers whose biggest complaint is something else.

Head-to-head

See all 8 water filter pitchers ranked →