ConsFirst / Instant cameras

Fujifilm

Fujifilm Instax Square SQ40: the downsides first

We may earn a commission when you buy through our links. It never changes what we report. Learn more

#5 of 8
$$Instax Wide/SquareScore 3.4/5
11%
of Amazon ratings are 1–2 stars
(checked 2026-10-10)
Small sample (406 ratings).

Wirecutter's top pick: a good-looking, three-setting camera that makes larger square prints with a classic creamy look. Square film costs more per shot than Mini, it runs on harder-to-find CR2 batteries, and Amazon owners report more blurry or badly exposed shots than with the Mini cameras.

Film cost: Instax Square film: about $1 to $1.20 a print (Wirecutter); about $1.10 for color and $1.60 for black-and-white (PCMag); from $0.99 (TechRadar). Every shot is printed.

Top complaints

  • Pricier film and CR2 batteries

    Square prints cost about $1 to $1.20 each, more than Mini (Wirecutter). PCMag puts color at about $1.10 a frame. Wirecutter and PCMag both note the CR2 batteries are harder to find and cost more than AAs.

  • Blurry, badly exposed or black pictures

    Amazon's review summary says many owners report blurry, over- or underexposed, or black pictures, and some say it doesn't work at all.

  • Auto flash, tiny viewfinder, few features

    Wirecutter says the automatic flash often turned selfie backgrounds black and the viewfinder is very small. PCMag notes it lacks multiple- and long-exposure options and a tripod socket.

What owners love

  • Effortless to use

    Wirecutter says it has just three settings (on, off and close-up) and is easy to hand to a kid. PCMag praises the easy one-button operation.

  • Classic, creamy square prints

    Wirecutter calls the prints creamy and filmlike with rich, saturated color, though not perfectly sharp. TechRadar says they deliver the desaturated vintage look you'd expect.

  • Handsome, solid build

    Wirecutter says it feels solid enough to survive the occasional drop. PCMag praises the attractive design and soft leatherette wrap.

Good for
  • Square, Polaroid-style prints on Instax film
  • A stylish party camera anyone can use
  • Selfies with a front mirror

Scores (tap for why)

  • Photo quality3.5
    Why 3.5?Rich, creamy prints but not perfectly sharp (Wirecutter). Amazon owners report blurry or badly exposed shots.
  • Ease of use4.5
    Why 4.5?Three settings and a selfie mirror (Wirecutter); easy one-button operation (PCMag). The viewfinder is small.
  • Film cost3.5
    Why 3.5?About $1 to $1.20 a print (Wirecutter), about $1.10 (PCMag): more than Mini, less than Polaroid.
  • Features & control2.0
    Why 2.0?Close-up mode and selfie mirror only; no multiple or long exposure and no tripod socket (PCMag).
  • Build & battery3.5
    Why 3.5?Solid enough for the occasional drop (Wirecutter), but two CR2 cells last only about 100 shots and are harder to find (Wirecutter, PCMag).

What experts say

  • Wirecutter (NYT): Top pick (updated 2026-06-25). Its flaws are the automatic flash, a very small viewfinder, CR2 batteries and only one color (black).
  • TechRadar: Listed as the best retro square camera under 'also consider': pricey, but a fantastic party camera almost anyone can use.
  • PCMag: Nearly identical inside to the cheaper SQ1, which remains PCMag's pick for square prints, so you pay a premium for the looks.
Check price on AmazonWe don't list prices — they change daily. Paid link.

If that catch is a deal-breaker

Highly ranked instant cameras whose biggest complaint is something else.

See all 8 instant cameras ranked →