ConsFirst / Steam mops

Shark

Shark Steam & Scrub with Steam Blaster: the downsides first

We may earn a commission when you buy through our links. It never changes what we report. Learn more

#4 of 8
$$$Steam mopScore 3.7/5
11%
of Amazon ratings are 1–2 stars
(checked 2026-10-10)

Picked by Good Housekeeping for scrubbing and Better Homes & Gardens for tile: spinning pads do the scrubbing and it nearly steers itself. But it loosens grime without picking it up, Wirecutter found it no better than cheaper mops, the cord is short and flimsy, and Amazon owners mention streaks and swirl marks.

Top complaints

  • Loosens grime but pushes debris around

    Better Homes & Gardens says the spinning pads loosen grime but don't absorb it, pushing clumps of dust and hair around so you have to pick them up afterward. Amazon owners report streaks and swirl marks.

  • Short, flimsy cord that can snag

    Good Housekeeping's con is the cord length (18 ft), Better Homes & Gardens found the cord flimsy and in the way, and Wirecutter says spinning-head mops can snag on their own cords.

  • Costs more without cleaning much better

    Wirecutter says the S8201 costs appreciably more than its picks and didn't clean noticeably better, with sticky honey slowing the spinning heads and the larger pads harder to get into corners. Amazon owners are split on value and some report no steam.

What owners love

  • Scrubs for you

    Good Housekeeping says the rotating pads plus three steam levels handle even the stickiest stains; Better Homes & Gardens says it works especially well on dried, set-in messes and grimy tile.

  • Nearly moves itself

    Good Housekeeping says it practically moves itself across the floor; Better Homes & Gardens says it's light (6.9 lb), one-handed and reaches under the fridge. Amazon owners compare it to a self-propelled lawn mower.

  • Durable, easy pads and headlights

    Good Housekeeping says the machine-washable pads are a cinch to attach and held up well to laundering, and LED headlights reveal hidden debris.

Good for
  • Dried, set-in messes on tile
  • Low-effort, one-handed mopping
  • Seeing dirt with LED headlights

Scores (tap for why)

  • Cleaning power3.5
    Why 3.5?Strong on dried, sticky stains (Good Housekeeping, Better Homes & Gardens) but leaves loosened debris behind (Better Homes & Gardens) and wasn't noticeably better than cheaper picks (Wirecutter).
  • Heat-up & steam time4.0
    Why 4.0?About 30 seconds to heat (Better Homes & Gardens); large 11.83-oz tank with three steam levels (Good Housekeeping).
  • Pads & refills3.5
    Why 3.5?Pads attach easily and survive laundering (Good Housekeeping), but the larger spinning pads are harder to get into corners (Wirecutter).
  • Weight & handling4.0
    Why 4.0?Nearly self-moving, 6.9 lb and one-handed (Good Housekeeping, Better Homes & Gardens); short, flimsy cord that can snag (Better Homes & Gardens, Wirecutter).
  • Leaks & durability3.5
    Why 3.5?11% Amazon low-star share on a small sample; some owners report no steam.

What experts say

  • Good Housekeeping: Best for scrubbing (updated 2026-06-19): easy to maneuver, LED headlights, large tank and three steam levels. Con: not the longest cord. Lists $190.
  • Better Homes & Gardens: Best for tile (updated 2026-10-06): heats in about 30 seconds and scrubs with little effort, but loosens grime without picking it up; flimsy cord.
  • Wirecutter (NYT): Not picked (updated 2025-11-19): costs appreciably more and didn't clean noticeably better; may be worth it on sale for large spaces.
Check price on AmazonWe don't list prices — they change daily. Paid link.

If that catch is a deal-breaker

Highly ranked steam mops whose biggest complaint is something else.

Head-to-head

See all 8 steam mops ranked →