ConsFirst / Steam mops / Compare
Shark S1000 Steam Mop vs Shark Steam & Scrub with Steam Blaster
Which one has the downsides you can live with?
We may earn a commission when you buy through our links. It never changes what we report. Learn more
The short answer
Shark S1000 Steam Mop ranks higher (#2 vs #4 of 8) and scores better on cleaning power, pads & refills. Shark Steam & Scrub with Steam Blaster wins on heat-up & steam time.
The biggest complaint about the Shark S1000 Steam Mop is one steam level; you pump for steam; for the Shark Steam & Scrub with Steam Blaster it's loosens grime but pushes debris around. Pick the one whose catch bothers you less.
Side by side
| Shark S1000 Steam Mop | Shark Steam & Scrub with Steam Blaster | |
|---|---|---|
| Rank in steam mops | #2 | #4 |
| Price tier | $ | $$$ |
| Type | Steam mop | Steam mop |
| Amazon 1–2★ share | 9% | 11% |
| Overall score | 3.8 | 3.7 |
| Cleaning power | 4.0 | 3.5 |
| Heat-up & steam time | 3.5 | 4.0 |
| Pads & refills | 4.0 | 3.5 |
| Weight & handling | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Leaks & durability | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Price tiers: $ under $80 · $$ $80–150 · $$$ over $150. Highlighted = clearly better (a score gap of 0.3 or more, or a 1–2★ share at least 3 points lower). Scores are explained, with sources, on each product's page.
Top complaints
Shark S1000 Steam Mop
- One steam level; you pump for steam
Good Housekeeping says it puts out the same steam on any surface, leaves floors a bit wetter than lower-output models, and only steams while you pump the handle, which can be an arm workout. Better Homes & Gardens calls the manual pumping slightly tedious.
- No steam or early breakdowns for some
Amazon's review summary says steam output gets mixed feedback, with some owners reporting no steam at all, and some report it breaking after six months.
- Floors only, no attachments
Good Housekeeping lists no attachments as a con and says it isn't the model for cleaning a variety of household surfaces.
Source: Good Housekeeping (S1000 review)
Shark Steam & Scrub with Steam Blaster
- Loosens grime but pushes debris around
Better Homes & Gardens says the spinning pads loosen grime but don't absorb it, pushing clumps of dust and hair around so you have to pick them up afterward. Amazon owners report streaks and swirl marks.
- Short, flimsy cord that can snag
Good Housekeeping's con is the cord length (18 ft), Better Homes & Gardens found the cord flimsy and in the way, and Wirecutter says spinning-head mops can snag on their own cords.
- Costs more without cleaning much better
Wirecutter says the S8201 costs appreciably more than its picks and didn't clean noticeably better, with sticky honey slowing the spinning heads and the larger pads harder to get into corners. Amazon owners are split on value and some report no steam.
Who should pick which
Pick the Shark S1000 Steam Mop if
A low-cost first steam mop
Busy tile and vinyl kitchens and baths
Easy carrying and upright storage
Skip it if: You want adjustable or continuous steam; You want attachments for other surfaces; You plan to steam wood or laminate (Good Housekeeping advises against it)
Pick the Shark Steam & Scrub with Steam Blaster if
Dried, set-in messes on tile
Low-effort, one-handed mopping
Seeing dirt with LED headlights
Skip it if: You want the lowest price; You hate going back over loosened debris; You clean lots of tight corners
We don't list prices — they change daily. Paid links.