ConsFirst / At-home IPL hair removal

Nood

Nood The Flasher 2.0: the downsides first

We may earn a commission when you buy through our links. It never changes what we report. Learn more

#6 of 8
$$IPLScore 3.5/5
Amazon 1–2 star share
not available

The value pick at GH and InStyle: light, simple, with a wide window for legs and a 90-day refund. It has no precision head for small or bony spots, and GH warns light can escape at the sides. Note that Wirecutter tested the newer Flasher Pro and found it irritating with little effect.

Top complaints

  • No precision head; light can escape

    One GH tester found bright light escaping from the sides on small, bony areas because there is no precision attachment, which she said could make it less effective and unsafe for eyes. InStyle and Women's Health also say the wide head is tricky for small spots like the bikini area or upper lip.

    Source: Good Housekeeping, InStyle, Women's Health
  • Can sting

    Byrdie notes it can sting when too close to the skin. InStyle's tester felt an occasional, very minimal burn.

    Source: Byrdie, InStyle
  • Short cord

    GH lists the shorter cord as a con.

    Source: Good Housekeeping

What owners love

  • Quick sessions on large areas

    InStyle's tester did both legs in about 15 minutes and saw a difference at two weeks. Forbes says sessions take around 10 minutes, and WH says legs take 15-20.

    Source: InStyle, Forbes Vetted, Women's Health
  • Light and easy

    GH testers raved about the easy device and instructions, and liked having an on-off button. Forbes' tester found it light enough that long sessions don't feel like a chore.

    Source: Good Housekeeping, Forbes Vetted
  • Refund and replacement policy

    Nood offers a full refund within 90 days and will replace the device if you ever run out of its 600,000 flashes (GH).

    Source: Good Housekeeping
Good for
  • Legs and other large areas
  • A lower-cost first device with a 90-day refund
  • Coarse hair (Forbes)

Scores (tap for why)

  • Results (as reported)3.5
    Why 3.5?InStyle's tester saw a difference at two weeks with some bare areas. Nood itself says more significant reduction comes at 6-8 weeks (Forbes). No owner data for the 2.0.
    Source: InStyle, Forbes Vetted
  • Comfort (pain, heat)3.5
    Why 3.5?InStyle's tester had no real pain, just an occasional minimal burn, and seven intensity levels allow a gentle start. Byrdie notes it can sting.
    Source: InStyle, Byrdie
  • Speed & coverage4.0
    Why 4.0?A wide window makes legs quick (15 minutes for InStyle, about 10-minute sessions per Forbes), but small spots are awkward with no precision head.
    Source: InStyle, Forbes Vetted, Good Housekeeping
  • Skin-tone range2.5
    Why 2.5?Very fair to olive light-brown skin (GH) or very fair to light brown (Forbes); skip if you have very dark skin. InStyle lists dark hair only.
    Source: Good Housekeeping, Forbes Vetted, InStyle
  • Durability & flash life4.0
    Why 4.0?600,000 flashes, and Nood will replace the device if you run out (GH). There is no owner reliability data for this model.
    Source: Good Housekeeping

What experts say

  • Good Housekeeping: Best value (updated 2026-07-15): easy, light, 600,000 flashes, FDA-cleared, very fair to olive light-brown skin; skip for small spots.
  • InStyle: Best budget (updated 2026-09-17): fast on legs, results at two weeks, tricky in tight spots.
  • Forbes Vetted: Best for coarse hair (2026-10-02): skip if you have very dark skin or want results in under six weeks.
Check price on AmazonWe don't list prices — they change daily. Paid link.

If that catch is a deal-breaker

Highly ranked at-home ipl hair removal whose biggest complaint is something else.

#1 in at-home ipl hair removalBraun Skin i·expert Smart IPL

An app-connected version of Braun's IPL that GH says is mostly the same hardware as the Pro 5. Women's Health and InStyle testers got strong results with little pain. The main drawbacks are the roughly $500 price and an app some users dislike.

Its catch: expensive#2 in at-home ipl hair removalIluminage Touch Permanent Hair Reduction System

Combines IPL with radio frequency, and Forbes says it was the first at-home device cleared by the FDA for all skin tones. InStyle's light-haired tester saw results at six weeks with no pain. It is slower to show results, has a short cord, and has few Amazon ratings.

Its catch: short cord, bulky dock#3 in at-home ipl hair removalUlike Air 10 IPL Hair Removal Device

The Amazon best seller and a pick at GH, Byrdie, Forbes, InStyle and Women's Health, with an ice-cooled head that testers found comfortable. Results were uneven in Wirecutter's panel, and a few GH testers got irritation, including hives.

Its catch: results vary between people

See all 8 at-home ipl hair removal ranked →