ConsFirst / At-home IPL hair removal
At-home IPL hair removal: the downsides, first
Results vary from person to person — Wirecutter's panel saw anything from major reduction to no change with the same device — and stinging or irritation comes up for four of the eight devices we compared. Expect hair reduction, not guaranteed permanent removal. Here are the most popular at-home IPL and laser hair removal devices in the US, with their downsides first.
8 models compared15 sources readUpdated October 2026
We may earn a commission when you buy through our links. It never changes what we report. Learn more
All 8 at-home ipl hair removal, ranked
Ranked by test scores, minus how common and serious the complaints are. How we rank
9%
of Amazon ratings are 1–2 stars
(checked 2026-10-10)Small sample (508 ratings).An app-connected version of Braun's IPL that GH says is mostly the same hardware as the Pro 5. Women's Health and InStyle testers got strong results with little pain. The main drawbacks are the roughly $500 price and an app some users dislike.
Top complaints
- ExpensiveVery common
Women's Health says the price is the only thing it doesn't like. InStyle says it sits at the higher end of the market and the upfront cost could be a hurdle unless on sale. Amazon value-for-money mentions are mixed.
- App not for everyoneMentioned often
GH notes some users didn't like having to use an app, and app functionality gets mixed Amazon feedback.
- Stings for someMentioned often
Amazon's summary says opinions on pain are mixed: some find it virtually painless while others report stinging. Effectiveness is also a mixed topic (96 mentions).
What owners love
- Testers saw quick slowdowns
InStyle's skeptical tester saw slower regrowth after one treatment and shaved her legs only once a week by 12 weeks. Women's Health's tester didn't need to shave her underarms for weeks after the first treatment.
- App guides heads and schedule
The app tells you which of the four heads to use, tracks coverage and reminds you when treatments are due (Women's Health, GH).
- Sensors that won't flash off-skin
GH's analyst praised the contact and skin-tone sensors: it won't flash until the lamp is fully pressed against skin, so you don't accidentally look into it.
Skip it if…- You don't want to use an app
- You're on a budget (the Pro 5 has the same core hardware)
- You have dark brown or black skin (GH)
Good for- People who want app reminders and coverage tracking
- Light to medium skin with dark hair
- Treating the bikini area (GH notes its manual covers the female pubic area)
Scores (tap for why)
- Results (as reported)4.0
Why 4.0?
InStyle and WH testers saw slower regrowth early, and hair reduction is a positive Amazon topic, but effectiveness mentions are mixed overall. - Comfort (pain, heat)4.0
Why 4.0?
WH's tester felt only 'a super quick, tiny pinch', and it has three comfort levels (GH). Amazon pain mentions are mixed. - Speed & coverage3.5
Why 3.5?
Four heads, including a wide one, and the app tracks coverage so you don't miss spots (GH, WH). No timed sessions were reported. - Skin-tone range3.0
Why 3.0?
GH lists most skin tones except dark brown and black; WH says it is best for light to medium skin with dark hair. - Durability & flash life4.0
Why 4.0?
Rated for 400,000 flashes and comes in a sturdy case (WH); GH says it won't overheat. Quality is a positive Amazon topic, with a 9% 1-2 star share on a small sample.
What experts say
- Women's Health: Best overall (updated 2026-08-26; tested since January 2024): largely pain-free with solid results; the only downside is price.
- InStyle: Best IPL device (updated 2026-09-17): results after the first use for a skeptical tester; pricey.
- Good Housekeeping: Best smart device: hardware mostly the same as the Pro 5, with impressive sensors; FDA-cleared, most skin tones except dark brown and black.
#2
Iluminage
$$$IPLScore 3.7/5
23%
of Amazon ratings are 1–2 stars
(checked 2026-10-10)Very small sample (37 ratings).Combines IPL with radio frequency, and Forbes says it was the first at-home device cleared by the FDA for all skin tones. InStyle's light-haired tester saw results at six weeks with no pain. It is slower to show results, has a short cord, and has few Amazon ratings.
Top complaints
- Short cord, bulky dockMentioned often
Byrdie lists the short cord as a con. Forbes says the charging station is quite large.
- Few Amazon ratings, many 1-starOccasional
The Amazon US listing has only 37 ratings, 19% of them 1-star. Amazon shows no review summary for it.
- Very bright flashesMentioned often
InStyle warns of super-bright flashes and says to use safety goggles where included.
What owners love
- Wider skin-tone and hair-color range
Forbes says IPL plus RF makes it suitable for more skin tones and hair colors, including blonde and red, and calls it the first at-home device FDA-cleared for all skin tones. Byrdie says it is FDA-cleared for all skin tones and hair colors.
- Worked on light hair, painlessly
InStyle's editorial director, who has light hair, saw slower, patchier regrowth starting at six weeks and didn't feel a single zap.
- Unlimited flashes
Unlimited flashes, with a precision adaptor and epilator attachment (Forbes). Byrdie names it best for large areas.
Skip it if…- You want quick results (6 weeks for InStyle's tester)
- You're short on counter space (large charging station, per Forbes)
- You want lots of owner feedback (only 37 Amazon ratings)
Good for- Deeper skin tones that most IPLs exclude (per Forbes and Byrdie)
- Blonde or red hair (InStyle, Forbes)
- People who want a painless feel
Scores (tap for why)
- Results (as reported)3.0
Why 3.0?
InStyle's light-haired tester saw slower, patchier regrowth from six weeks, with reduced thickness and amount by the end. Little other test data. - Comfort (pain, heat)4.5
Why 4.5?
InStyle's tester didn't feel even one zap, and InStyle recommends it for sensitive skin. - Speed & coverage3.0
Why 3.0?
Byrdie names it best for large areas, but results took six weeks for InStyle's tester, and the cord is short (Byrdie). - Skin-tone range5.0
Why 5.0?
The only pick that Forbes and Byrdie describe as FDA-cleared for all skin tones; also works on blonde and red hair per InStyle and Forbes. - Durability & flash life3.0
Why 3.0?
Unlimited flashes (Forbes, Byrdie), but the 1-2 star share is 23% on a very small Amazon sample.
What experts say
- Forbes Vetted: Best for dark skin tones (2026-10-02): IPL plus RF, FDA-cleared, all skin tones; the brand says results after two treatments and full results in seven weeks.
- InStyle: Best for blonde hair (updated 2026-09-17): results from six weeks with no pain; very bright flashes.
- Byrdie: Best for large areas (updated 2026-06-18): FDA-cleared for all skin tones and hair colors, unlimited flashes; short cord.
13%
of Amazon ratings are 1–2 stars
(checked 2026-10-10)3,415 ratings. A Deluxe Version listing (B0G39WBP1S, 281 ratings) was not checked.The Amazon best seller and a pick at GH, Byrdie, Forbes, InStyle and Women's Health, with an ice-cooled head that testers found comfortable. Results were uneven in Wirecutter's panel, and a few GH testers got irritation, including hives.
Top complaints
- Results vary between peopleVery common
In Wirecutter's three-month panel, some testers saw major hair-growth reduction while others saw minimal to no change. Amazon's summary says some owners say it works well while others report it doesn't function properly (functionality is a mixed topic, 675 mentions).
- Irritation for someMentioned often
A few GH testers had irritation, including hives, after use, and GH suggests skipping it if your skin is sensitive. Byrdie notes it occasionally pinches skin. (InStyle's tester, by contrast, never had tender skin.)
- Single big head, noisy fan, frequent sessionsMentioned often
Wirecutter found its one head too big to hold evenly on concave or convex spots. Women's Health says the cooling fan is a bit noisy. InStyle notes you need to use it every other day to see results, and both legs took about 20 minutes.
What owners love
- Cooling makes it comfortable
The sapphire head is cooled to about 65°F (Forbes, Women's Health). Wirecutter says the glide mode and skin cooling made treatment less painful, and GH's tester felt condensation form on the cold head. Pain-free is a positive Amazon topic (368 mentions).
- Fast results in GH's study
GH testers gave it the highest scores for hair reduction after repeated use and for ease of use on all body parts, and it gave the fastest results of the devices tested. Women's Health's tester saw thinning in three weeks.
- Modes for thick hair and large areas
Four modes, including a stubborn-hair mode that fires two flashes per press, an auto-glide mode and a skin-tone sensor that sets intensity (GH, Forbes).
Skip it if…- You have very dark (Fitzpatrick VI) skin, or blonde, red, gray or white hair (Forbes)
- Your skin is on the sensitive side (GH)
- You want one head small enough for knees and ankles (Wirecutter)
Good for- Comfort, thanks to the cooled head
- Thick or stubborn hair (dual-flash mode)
- Gliding over legs with auto-flash
Scores (tap for why)
- Results (as reported)3.5
Why 3.5?
Top hair-reduction scores and the fastest results in GH's study, but Wirecutter's panel was split from major reduction to none, and Amazon functionality mentions are mixed. - Comfort (pain, heat)4.0
Why 4.0?
The cooled head makes treatment less painful (Wirecutter, Forbes, WH), and InStyle named it best for sensitive skin. GH saw irritation in a few testers, and Byrdie notes occasional pinching. - Speed & coverage3.5
Why 3.5?
Auto-glide and dual flashes; Forbes cites about 10 minutes for full-body sessions. InStyle took about 20 minutes for both legs and needed sessions every other day, and WH estimates 20-30 minutes for a full treatment. - Skin-tone range3.0
Why 3.0?
GH lists fair to medium/dark skin, Forbes light to medium, and WH fair to olive with brown to black hair. Not recommended for Fitzpatrick VI or blonde, red, gray or white hair (Forbes). - Durability & flash life3.5
Why 3.5?
Forbes lists unlimited flashes, but GH lists 300,000. Quality is a positive Amazon topic (587 mentions), though some owners say it doesn't function properly. The 1-2 star share is 13%.
What experts say
- Good Housekeeping: Best for thick hair (updated 2026-07-15): top scores for hair reduction and ease of use, fastest results, but a few testers had irritation including hives.
- Wirecutter (NYT): Not a pick (2026-09-04): easy and less painful thanks to glide and cooling, but some testers saw major reduction and others minimal to none.
- Byrdie: Best overall (updated 2026-06-18): effective at slowing hair growth; occasionally pinches skin.
16%
of Amazon ratings are 1–2 stars
(checked 2026-10-10)2,092 ratings on the 2-head IPL5157 kit. The 4-head IPL5347 listing (B09WQRVPYP, 1,484 ratings) shows 14%.Wirecutter's only pick and Forbes Vetted's best overall: simple to use, with testers describing the flash as a brief 'heated flick'. It is not for melanin-rich skin or light hair, legs take a while, and Amazon owners report units that stop working or flash unreliably.
Top complaints
- Some units stop working or misfireMentioned often
Amazon's review summary says owners report it stopping working after days and flashing only half the time when triggered. Reliability (90 mentions) and flash performance (45) are both negative topics. A second listing's summary mentions devices breaking within about two years.
- Results vary; can take longer than 12 weeksMentioned often
GH notes some testers said it took longer than 12 weeks to see results. On Amazon, value for money (197 mentions) and pain (102) are mixed, and the 4-head listing's summary says some owners see significant reduction while others see no change.
- Hard on curves; slow on big areasMentioned often
The sensor only flashes when the head is completely flat on skin, so several Wirecutter testers struggled around knees and ankles. One tester needed 20 minutes for both legs even in glide mode. Byrdie lists 'not as user-friendly as other picks'.
What owners love
- Testers saw reduced regrowth
Most Wirecutter testers noticed a significant reduction in hair growth after about three weeks, and four said some areas stopped growing entirely after three months. Forbes' and GH's testers noticed results after about four weeks.
- Not painful for most testers
Wirecutter testers said the flashes weren't painful. It has standard, gentle and extra-gentle modes, and a sensor that reads skin tone and adjusts intensity (Wirecutter, GH, Forbes).
- Simple, with a skin-tone safety sensor
Two buttons, three modes and a glide function. The sensor prevents flashing on skin tones that could be injured, per Wirecutter. A Wirecutter staffer's unit was still working after almost three years.
Skip it if…- Your skin is Fitzpatrick type IV or deeper (Wirecutter)
- Your hair is gray, white, red or light blond
- You want fast full-leg sessions (20 minutes for one Wirecutter tester)
Good for- Light to medium skin with dark hair
- Beginners who want few buttons and an auto skin-tone sensor
- Face and body (two heads, precision cap included)
Scores (tap for why)
- Results (as reported)4.0
Why 4.0?
Most Wirecutter testers saw a significant reduction by about three weeks, and some areas stopped growing after three months. GH notes some needed longer than 12 weeks, and Amazon owners are split on results. - Comfort (pain, heat)4.0
Why 4.0?
Wirecutter testers found the flashes not painful, and it has two gentler modes. Amazon pain mentions are mixed. - Speed & coverage3.5
Why 3.5?
GH names it the fastest (short time between flashes; Braun claims both legs in under 5 minutes), but a Wirecutter tester took 20 minutes for both legs, and full skin contact is hard on knees and ankles. - Skin-tone range2.5
Why 2.5?
Light to medium skin tones only (GH, Forbes). Wirecutter says it is not safe for Fitzpatrick type IV and up, and Braun does not recommend it for gray, white, red or light blond hair. - Durability & flash life3.0
Why 3.0?
Rated for 400,000 flashes, with no flash counter, and a 5-year warranty if registered (Wirecutter). But Amazon reliability and flash-performance mentions are negative, and the 1-2 star share is 16%.
What experts say
- Wirecutter (NYT): Top pick (published 2026-09-04; 5 devices, 11 panelists, three months). Intuitive and effective, but not safe for Fitzpatrick IV and up, tricky on curvy areas and slow on large ones.
- Forbes Vetted: Best overall (updated 2026-10-02). Tester saw results after four weeks and now maintains monthly to every two months; skip if you have light hair or dark skin.
- Good Housekeeping: Fastest pick (updated 2026-07-15). Braun claims both legs in under five minutes; FDA-cleared, light to medium skin tones.
#5
Philips
$$$IPLScore 3.6/5
Amazon 1–2 star share
not available
GH's best overall: easy to hold, consistent flashes, four attachments and a skin-tone sensor, and it didn't burn testers' skin. It is expensive, tricky on the bikini area, and Wirecutter chose not to panel-test Philips.
Top complaints
- ExpensiveVery common
GH lists it at $580, the priciest IPL in its roundup. Expert Reviews lists 'Expensive' as its main con.
- Awkward on the bikini areaMentioned often
GH testers found the bikini area tricky with this device and suggest passing if that is your main focus.
- Fiddly to clean, slower than claimedMentioned often
Expert Reviews found the narrow windows fiddly to clean when residue bakes on. It timed 18 minutes per full leg versus Philips' advertised 10, and cordless use slows the flash rate.
What owners love
- Comfortable and didn't burn
GH testers said it was super easy to hold, with a comfortable power level and consistent flashes, and it did not burn skin. Expert Reviews found it mostly comfortable, with a slight zap at high settings on thin skin.
- Visible reduction in a reviewer's test
Expert Reviews' tester (pale skin, thick dark hair) saw leg, stomach and face hair almost disappear after four treatments two weeks apart, though underarms needed more. Philips claims over 90% hair reduction in three treatments (GH).
- Versatile, with a skin sensor
Five energy settings, four attachments (face, bikini, underarms, body) and SenseIQ sensors that read skin tone, plus a contact check before flashing (GH).
Skip it if…- You mainly want to treat the bikini area (GH)
- You have blonde hair or darker skin
- You're on a budget (about $580)
Good for- Large areas like arms and legs
- Several body zones (four attachments)
- Cordless use (Expert Reviews)
Scores (tap for why)
- Results (as reported)4.0
Why 4.0?
GH's top-tested pick, and Expert Reviews saw most body hair almost gone after four treatments. No US owner data. - Comfort (pain, heat)4.0
Why 4.0?
Comfortable power level and no burns for GH testers. Expert Reviews felt only a slight zap at high settings on thin skin. - Speed & coverage3.5
Why 3.5?
Expert Reviews found it faster than other IPLs it used, but timed 18 minutes per leg (versus 10 claimed) and about 45 minutes for the full body. GH recommends it for large areas. - Skin-tone range3.0
Why 3.0?
GH lists fair to medium brown skin. Expert Reviews calls it suitable for the widest range of skin tones of the Philips machines, but says blondes won't have much luck and darker skin risks burns; the sensor stops flashing on too-dark skin. - Durability & flash life3.5
Why 3.5?
Rated for 400,000 flashes (GH) or 450,000 (Expert Reviews, UK model). No hardware faults reported, but there is no owner failure data.
What experts say
- Good Housekeeping: Best overall (updated 2026-07-15): top-tested in GH's latest study; FDA-cleared, fair to medium brown skin tones, harder on the bikini area.
- Expert Reviews: UK review (2023-07-13, models BRI-955/958): 'brilliantly designed, effective' but expensive and fiddly to clean.
- Wirecutter (NYT): Ruled out Philips without panel testing, citing reasons including insufficient or unfavorable reviews, limited warranties and value concerns (not specific to this model).
Amazon 1–2 star share
not available
The value pick at GH and InStyle: light, simple, with a wide window for legs and a 90-day refund. It has no precision head for small or bony spots, and GH warns light can escape at the sides. Note that Wirecutter tested the newer Flasher Pro and found it irritating with little effect.
Top complaints
- No precision head; light can escapeVery common
One GH tester found bright light escaping from the sides on small, bony areas because there is no precision attachment, which she said could make it less effective and unsafe for eyes. InStyle and Women's Health also say the wide head is tricky for small spots like the bikini area or upper lip.
- Can stingMentioned often
Byrdie notes it can sting when too close to the skin. InStyle's tester felt an occasional, very minimal burn.
- Short cordOccasional
GH lists the shorter cord as a con.
What owners love
- Quick sessions on large areas
InStyle's tester did both legs in about 15 minutes and saw a difference at two weeks. Forbes says sessions take around 10 minutes, and WH says legs take 15-20.
- Light and easy
GH testers raved about the easy device and instructions, and liked having an on-off button. Forbes' tester found it light enough that long sessions don't feel like a chore.
- Refund and replacement policy
Nood offers a full refund within 90 days and will replace the device if you ever run out of its 600,000 flashes (GH).
Skip it if…- You mainly want to treat the face or small spots
- You have very dark skin (Forbes)
- You want results in under six weeks (Forbes)
Good for- Legs and other large areas
- A lower-cost first device with a 90-day refund
- Coarse hair (Forbes)
Scores (tap for why)
- Results (as reported)3.5
Why 3.5?
InStyle's tester saw a difference at two weeks with some bare areas. Nood itself says more significant reduction comes at 6-8 weeks (Forbes). No owner data for the 2.0. - Comfort (pain, heat)3.5
Why 3.5?
InStyle's tester had no real pain, just an occasional minimal burn, and seven intensity levels allow a gentle start. Byrdie notes it can sting. - Speed & coverage4.0
Why 4.0?
A wide window makes legs quick (15 minutes for InStyle, about 10-minute sessions per Forbes), but small spots are awkward with no precision head. - Skin-tone range2.5
Why 2.5?
Very fair to olive light-brown skin (GH) or very fair to light brown (Forbes); skip if you have very dark skin. InStyle lists dark hair only. - Durability & flash life4.0
Why 4.0?
600,000 flashes, and Nood will replace the device if you run out (GH). There is no owner reliability data for this model.
What experts say
- Good Housekeeping: Best value (updated 2026-07-15): easy, light, 600,000 flashes, FDA-cleared, very fair to olive light-brown skin; skip for small spots.
- InStyle: Best budget (updated 2026-09-17): fast on legs, results at two weeks, tricky in tight spots.
- Forbes Vetted: Best for coarse hair (2026-10-02): skip if you have very dark skin or want results in under six weeks.
#7
SmoothSkin
$$IPLScore 3.1/5
20%
of Amazon ratings are 1–2 stars
(checked 2026-10-10)Small sample (479 ratings).GH's pick for beginners: an automatic skin-tone sensor, three simple modes and unlimited flashes, and testers found it only mildly uncomfortable. Amazon owners are split on whether it works, and several say it broke within six months.
Top complaints
- Works for some, not othersVery common
Amazon's summary says effectiveness (152 mentions) and value for money are mixed: some say it works well, others find it ineffective and not worth the cost.
- Breaks or won't fireMentioned often
Several Amazon owners report it breaking within six months. Others report difficulty getting it to fire, and problems with the indicator lights, particularly for dark skin.
- Starts up as soon as it is plugged inOccasional
GH notes it turns on automatically and its fans start whirring when plugged in.
What owners love
- Easy for beginners
GH testers found it easy to use as a newbie, with an informative user guide. Ease of use is a positive Amazon topic.
- Mild sensation
GH testers noted minimal discomfort in speed and gentle modes. InStyle's tester with easily irritated skin was surprised how non-painful it was, describing quick hot flashes that faded within a second or two.
- Safety sensor and unlimited flashes
It won't flash if skin is too dark or the head isn't held properly against skin, and it has unlimited flashes (GH).
Skip it if…- You have dark brown skin (GH)
- You want a proven, long-lasting unit (Amazon durability complaints)
- Your hair is light (InStyle lists dark and some shades of blonde)
Good for- First-time IPL users
- People who want the device to set intensity
- Underarms and bikini line (precision head included)
Scores (tap for why)
- Results (as reported)3.0
Why 3.0?
One GH tester saw results after one use, and InStyle's tester had areas with little regrowth, but Amazon effectiveness mentions are mixed. - Comfort (pain, heat)4.0
Why 4.0?
Minimal discomfort for GH testers and InStyle's sensitive-skin tester. Skin irritation is a mixed Amazon topic. - Skin-tone range3.0
Why 3.0?
GH lists all skin tones except dark brown, and the sensor won't flash on too-dark skin. Some Amazon owners report indicator-light problems for dark skin. - Durability & flash life2.5
Why 2.5?
Unlimited flashes (GH), but durability is a negative Amazon topic, with several units breaking within six months, and the 1-2 star share is 20%.
What experts say
- Good Housekeeping: Best for beginners (updated 2026-07-15): one tester saw noticeable results after a single use; FDA-cleared, all skin tones except dark brown.
- InStyle: Best for dark, thick hair (updated 2026-09-17): gentle on a tester's easily irritated skin, with areas where hair hardly grew back.
#8
Tria
$$$Diode laserScore 2.8/5
Amazon 1–2 star share
not available
A true 810 nm diode laser, cordless and precise, that Forbes recommends for small areas. It is more painful than IPLs, very slow on large areas like legs, and costs about $600.
Top complaints
- More painfulVery common
Forbes' tester found it more painful than the other devices on its list, like a rubber band snap. We Are Body Beautiful describes a sharp, biting burn at higher settings for some users.
- Very slow on large areasVery common
The window is just over 5 mm. We Are Body Beautiful estimates both full legs take roughly 2-4 hours over several charges, with about 30 minutes per charge and about 2 hours to recharge. Forbes says it is better for small areas.
- Heavy, delicate, battery fadeMentioned often
We Are Body Beautiful lists it as heavy (about 600 g) and describes it as delicate, noting some users report the battery holding less charge over time and no repair service after drops. It cannot be used while charging.
What owners love
- Precise on small areas
Forbes' tester found it incredibly precise and easy to grip, ideal for underarms, lower face or neck.
- Strong results in a long test
In We Are Body Beautiful's trial, bald patches appeared after 4 sessions and most hair was gone after 6; underarms were still smooth after 11. Tria claims 'up to 75%' hair reduction after 2 treatments, based on its own clinical trial.
- No bright flashes, cordless
Unlike IPL, there are no bright flashes, and it runs cordless (We Are Body Beautiful). Tria says it is FDA-cleared for permanent hair reduction, defined as a long-term stable reduction in regrowth.
Skip it if…- You want to treat whole legs or large areas
- You have a low pain tolerance
- Your skin is Fitzpatrick V-VI, or your hair is light blonde, red, white or gray
Good for- Small areas like underarms, lower face and neck
- Dark hair on light to medium skin (Fitzpatrick I-IV)
- Cordless use
Scores (tap for why)
- Results (as reported)4.5
Why 4.5?
Most hair gone after 6 sessions in We Are Body Beautiful's trial, and Forbes' tester notes long-lasting results. Tria's own trial claims are not independent. - Comfort (pain, heat)2.0
Why 2.0?
Forbes' tester found it the most painful on its list; We Are Body Beautiful describes a biting burn at high settings for some users. - Speed & coverage1.5
Why 1.5?
A window of just over 5 mm, about 30 minutes per charge, and roughly 2-4 hours for both legs (We Are Body Beautiful). - Skin-tone range3.0
Why 3.0?
Fitzpatrick I-IV (Forbes, We Are Body Beautiful); not for V-VI. Works on black to dark blonde hair, not light blonde, red, white or gray. - Durability & flash life3.0
Why 3.0?
1-year warranty (maker). The old manual states a 3-year service life, Tria cites at least 300 charge cycles, and some users report battery fade and a delicate body (We Are Body Beautiful).
What experts say
- Forbes Vetted: Best for small areas (2026-10-02): precise diode laser for skin types I-IV; more painful than the IPLs.
- We Are Body Beautiful: 4.5/5 (updated 2025-11-28): a good choice for face and underarms, but not for legs or whole body; can hurt.