ConsFirst / Smartwatches & fitness trackers / Compare

Apple Watch Ultra 4 vs Amazfit Active 3 Premium

Which one has the downsides you can live with?

We may earn a commission when you buy through our links. It never changes what we report. Learn more

The short answer

Apple Watch Ultra 4 ranks higher (#3 vs #4 of 8) and scores better on fitness tracking, smart features, durability. Amazfit Active 3 Premium wins on comfort.

The biggest complaint about the Apple Watch Ultra 4 is huge and uncomfortable for smaller wrists; for the Amazfit Active 3 Premium it's limited smartwatch features. Pick the one whose catch bothers you less.

Side by side

Apple Watch Ultra 4Amazfit Active 3 Premium
Rank in smartwatches & fitness trackers#3#4
Price tier$$$$
TypeSmartwatchSmartwatch
Amazon 1–2★ share—5%
Overall score4.13.6
Battery life4.04.0
Fitness tracking4.54.0
Smart features4.52.5
Comfort2.54.0
Durability5.03.5

Price tiers: $ under $150 · $$ $150–350 · $$$ over $350. Highlighted = clearly better (a score gap of 0.3 or more, or a 1–2★ share at least 3 points lower). Scores are explained, with sources, on each product's page.

Top complaints

Apple Watch Ultra 4

  • Huge and uncomfortable for smaller wrists

    Wirecutter's tester, with 6-inch wrists, found the 49 mm watch uncomfortable to sleep in and says it slides around during exercise. She suggests the 40 mm SE or 42 mm Series 12 for small wrists.

  • Minor upgrade over the Ultra 3

    Wirecutter says it brings no design changes and largely the same health and fitness features, so it will feel stale to Ultra owners. Tom's Guide also says the design and display are basically unchanged.

  • Expensive, with some features not ready

    Wirecutter says it costs double a 42 mm Series 12, which has the same health features, and the Audio Intelligence features aren't ready to try yet.

Amazfit Active 3 Premium

  • Limited smartwatch features

    Tom's Guide says you don't get the emergency alerts, on-watch calls or third-party apps of Apple and Google watches. Runtesters calls the ecosystem weaker, with a smaller app store, payments not available everywhere, and less polished watch faces and music support.

  • Heart rate struggles on hard efforts

    Runtesters says heart rate is good overall but falls behind during high-intensity runs. Amazon's summary says customers note accuracy issues, especially with high-intensity heart-rate monitoring. Runtesters also notes it has only single-band GPS.

  • Battery short of the 12-day claim

    Tom's Guide got just over a week, about eight days, against Amazfit's 12-day claim. Runtesters says GPS battery life seems shorter than advertised and that it needs a proprietary charger.

  • Few style options and phone hiccups

    Tom's Guide's only listed con is the lack of 'feminine' style options despite being aimed at women; it comes in black, navy and white. Amazon owners report mixed experiences with compatibility.

Who should pick which

Pick the Apple Watch Ultra 4 if

  • Hikers, triathletes and divers with an iPhone

  • Going two or more days between charges

  • People who want a big, rugged screen

Skip it if: You have small wrists or want to sleep in it comfortably; You own an Ultra 3; You don't need endurance or outdoor features

Pick the Amazfit Active 3 Premium if

  • Budget buyers who want serious fitness tracking

  • Week-long battery life

  • People who switch between iPhone and Android

Skip it if: You want fall detection, health alerts or third-party apps; You do high-intensity interval training and need precise heart rate; You want dual-band GPS

We don't list prices — they change daily. Paid links.

See all 8 smartwatches & fitness trackers ranked →