ConsFirst / Smartwatches & fitness trackers / Compare
Google Pixel Watch 4 vs Garmin Vivoactive 6
Which one has the downsides you can live with?
We may earn a commission when you buy through our links. It never changes what we report. Learn more
The short answer
Google Pixel Watch 4 ranks higher (#1 vs #4 of 12) and scores better on smart features. Garmin Vivoactive 6 wins on battery life.
The biggest complaint about the Google Pixel Watch 4 is battery and value split owners; for the Garmin Vivoactive 6 it's some units fail or lose connection. Pick the one whose catch bothers you less.
Good for: Android users on any brand of phone
Its catch: battery and value split owners
Check price on AmazonGood for: Fitness-focused users on iPhone or Android
Its catch: some units fail or lose connection
Check price on AmazonPaid links. We don't list prices — they change daily. Neither one feels right?
Side by side
| Google Pixel Watch 4 | Garmin Vivoactive 6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Rank in smartwatches & fitness trackers | #1 | #4 |
| Price tier | $$$ | $$ |
| Type | Smartwatch | Fitness smartwatch |
| Amazon 1–2★ share | 11% | 11% |
| Overall score | 3.9 | 3.7 |
| Battery life | 3.5 | 4.0 |
| Fitness tracking | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Smart features | 4.5 | 3.0 |
| Comfort | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Durability | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Price tiers: $ under $150 · $$ $150–350 · $$$ over $350. Highlighted = clearly better (a score gap of 0.3 or more, or a 1–2★ share at least 3 points lower). Scores are explained, with sources, on each product's page.
Top complaints
Google Pixel Watch 4
- Battery and value split owners
Amazon's review summary says battery life and value for money get mixed reviews, with some owners saying the battery only lasts a couple of days and others saying it isn't worth the price. Tom's Guide, by contrast, got close to 60 hours on the 45 mm model.
- Heart-rate accuracy questioned
Amazon's review summary says customers disagree on how accurate the heart-rate tracking is. Tom's Guide calls the fitness and health updates incremental.
- New charger, and SOS only on LTE
Tom's Guide lists incompatibility with older chargers as a con, along with satellite SOS messaging being limited to the pricier LTE models.
Garmin Vivoactive 6
- Some units fail or lose connection
Amazon's review summary says customers disagree on reliability, with some reporting it stops working after a couple of months, and that connectivity and durability are mixed, including screen cracks after six months. One Amazon reviewer says Bluetooth disconnects often.
- Limited smart features and apps
Tom's Guide lists limited third-party apps and smart features as a con; there's no LTE option, and no onboard ECG or skin-temperature sensor.
- No altimeter; smart alarm needs work
Without an altimeter it undercounted climbs in Tom's Guide's tests (by about 14 ft against an Apple Watch SE and 34 ft against a Galaxy Watch 7). Tom's Guide found the Smart Alarm's 30-minute window too short and its vibrations jarring, and an Amazon reviewer also calls the smart alarm not great.
Who should pick which
Pick the Google Pixel Watch 4 if
Android users on any brand of phone
Two days between charges (45 mm)
People who want a repairable watch (replaceable battery and screen)
Skip it if: You use an iPhone; You want satellite SOS without paying for LTE; You want to reuse an older Pixel Watch charger
Pick the Garmin Vivoactive 6 if
Fitness-focused users on iPhone or Android
About a week between charges
Small wrists (42 mm, 23 g)
Skip it if: You want apps, LTE or a full smartwatch; You hike and want accurate elevation (no altimeter); You want ECG or skin-temperature sensing
We don't list prices — they change daily. Paid links.
Neither one feels right?
If both catches are deal-breakers, start here.
Tom's Guide's best smartwatch overall: about a week-plus of battery, Garmin-like running features, offline maps and a sapphire screen for around $140, on any phone. It lacks the safety alerts, apps and polish of Apple and Google watches, and heart-rate tracking struggles on hard efforts.
Its catch: limited smartwatch featuresA third option · #2Garmin Forerunner 165A budget Garmin running watch with an AMOLED screen and GPS and heart-rate accuracy that Android Central found as good as pricier Forerunners, plus about 11 days of battery. It holds back Training Load and Training Status, music costs extra, and it's a fitness watch first, not a full smartwatch.
Its catch: key training features held backAll 12 comparedSee every smartwatch, rankedEach one's biggest complaint at a glance, with the full ranking.
Browse smartwatches & fitness trackers →